Guide an Independent Research Inquiry to the Right Process
Clarify an early study idea and explain the submission path without promising support or funding.
A researcher with an early study idea may want to know whether the company is interested before investing time in a protocol. The medical science liaison can explain the approved inquiry or submission process and help the researcher understand what information that process requests. The liaison cannot promise funding, study support, approval, or a timeline for a review decision.
Ask where the idea stands, whether a protocol exists, and what process question the researcher needs answered. Keep the discussion at the level of the submission route. Avoid suggesting that an interesting hypothesis will receive support or that a study outcome is expected. The conversation should give the researcher clarity about how an independent proposal is considered.
In a fictional meeting, the researcher asks, “Will you fund this?” The liaison responds, “I cannot make a funding commitment, but I can explain the approved process for submitting an independent research inquiry and help you find the required materials. Do you have a protocol yet, or are you looking for the criteria before developing one?” The researcher says the idea is early stage and requests the criteria.
Coach the exchange with a researcher who asks for a favorable signal before submitting. Score whether the liaison stays encouraging without implying a result, gathers the process need, and names the authorized submission owner. In debrief, review the follow-up for accurate instructions and no hidden promise. A useful handoff makes the next action visible while preserving the independence and review requirements of the research process.
Practice these next
Prepare for a scientific advisory conversation with a clear scope and balanced evidence plan.
Provide dated references for a committee discussion without directing a protocol change.
Clarify a medical director’s request and coordinate balanced materials before a committee meeting.
Capture a researcher's early scientific question clearly while avoiding a commitment about study support or protocol direction.
Clarify a literature question and provide an appropriate scientific information route without selectively building a clinical argument.
Clarify the scientific question, intended use, and evidence scope before arranging follow-up.